Case Report of Succesful Multidisiplinary Treatment for Patient with Metastatic Lung Cancer and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphatic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Introduction: Croatian National Cancer Registry of Croatian Institute for Public Health reported that in year 2020 lung cancer was the second most common cancer site diagnosed in men with 16% and the third most common in women with 10% incidence among all cancer sites. Unfortunatelly lung cancer has the highest mortality in both men and women. Haematological malignancies had 7% share in all malignancies in both male and female cances cases. In 2020 190 newly diagnosed cases of lymphatic leukemia in men and 128 cases in women were reporeted, meaning 1.5 and 1.2% of all malignancies, respectively. Chronic lymphatic leukemia (CLL) is an advanced age disease and incidence increases with age. Impaired immunity, T and B cell dysfunction in CLL, chromosomal aberations, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and genetic factors can all cause secondary malignancies. Co- occurence of solid tumors and CLL is very rare. Although patiens with CLL have an increased risk of developing second primary malignancies including lung carcinoma, the data about their clinical outcomes are lacking. Parekh et al. retrospectively analyzed patients with simultaneous CLL and lung carcinoma over a 20-year period, and they found that ~2% of patients with CLL actually developed lung carcinoma. The authors claimed that up to 38% of patients will also develop a third neoplasm more likely of the skin (melanoma and basal cell carcinoma), larynx (laryngeal carcinoma) or colon. Currently there are no specific guidelines for concurrent CLL and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treatment. Usually, when the tumors are diagnosed simultaneously, treatment is based to target the most aggressive malignancy, as the clinical outcomes depend on the response of the tumor with the poorest prognosis. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. Case report: A patient with history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 2019 (at the age of 71) with B chronic lymphocytic leukemia with bulky tumor (inguinal lymph nodes 8x5 cm), stage B according to Binet, intermediate risk. He was treated with 6 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab/cyclofosfamid/fludarabine). In 10/2019 remission was confirmed, but MSCT described tumor in the posterior segment of upper right lung lobe measuring 20x17 mm and bilateral metastases up to 11 mm. Bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed, and EGFR neg, ALK neg, ROS 1 neg, PD-L1>50% adenocarcinoma was confirmed. He was referred to Clinical Hospital Center Osijek where monotherapy with pembrolizumab in a standard dose of 200 mg intravenously was started in 01/2020. Partial remission was confirmed in October 2020. Immunotherapy was discontinued due to development of pneumonitis, dysphagia and severe weight loss (20kg), but without radiologically confirmed disease progression. At that time he was referred to our hospital for further treatment. Gastroscopy has shown erosive gastritis with active duodenal ulcus, Forrest III. Supportive therapy and proton pump inhibitor were introduced. After complete regression of pneumonitis, improvement of general condition and resolution of dysphagia, no signs of lung cancer progression were found and pembrolizumab was reintroduced in 12/2021. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 01/2021 and levothyroxine replacement ther apy was started. In 03/2021 he underwent surgical removal of basal cell carcinoma of skin on the right temporal region with lobe reconstruction. From 02/2021, when pembrolizumab was reintroduced, regression in tumor size was continously confirmed with complete recovery of general condition. He was hospitalized for COVID 19 infection in 09/2021, and due to complications pembrolizumab was discontinued till 11/2021. Lung cancer immunotherapy proceeded till 11/2022, when Multidisciplinary team decided to finish pembrolizumab because of CLL relapse. CLL was in remission till August 2022 when due to B symptoms, lymphcytosis, anemia and generalized lymphadenopathy, hematological workup including biopsy of cervical lymph node was performed and CLL/SLL relapse was confirmed. Initially chlorambucil was introduced, but disease was refractory. Based on cytogenetic test results (IGHV unmutated, negative TP53) and due to cardiovascular comorbidity (contraindication for BTK inhibitors) venetoclax and rituximab were started in 01/2023. After just 1 cycle of treatment normal blood count as well as regression of B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy occured, indicating the probability of complete disease remission. In our patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma excellent disease control is achieved during 41 month of treatment in first line setting. Furthermore, relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL is currently in confirmed remission. Conclusion(s): Successful treatment of patients with multiple primary malignancies is based on multidisciplinarity, early recognition and management of side effects, treatment of comorbidities with the aim of prolonging life, controlling symptoms of disease and preserving quality of life.

Future challenges and their impact on respiratory health and lung cancer

Air pollution, climate and population health are closely related in terms of their impacts on respiratory health and lung cancer. Air pollutants contribute to the exacerbation of chronic respiratory problems such as COPD and asthma. Air pollutants are also toxic and carcinogenic, initiating and promoting lung cancer development. Climate change in relation to environmental pollution affects the geographical distribution of food supply and diseases such as pneumonia in adults and children. The threat of air pollution, and hence global warming and climate changes, and their effects on population and respiratory health, is an imminent threat to the world and deserves immediate and sustainable combating strategies and efforts. The goals are to increase public awareness and engagement in action, with alignment of international collaboration and policy, and with steering towards further research. Now is the prime time for international collaborative efforts on planning and actions to fight air pollution and climate change before it is too late.Copyright © ERS 2021.

Association of state-level COVID-19 mortality rates with real-world progression and real-world overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 2020-2022

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the delivery of cancer care and outcomes in the United States (US). We examined the association between time-varying state-level weekly COVID19 mortality and progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to progression (rwTTP), and survival (rwOS) among pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advNSCLC). Method(s): This retrospective study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health recordderived de-identified database. The cohort included community oncology pts diagnosed with advNSCLC between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 (follow-up through March 30, 2022). We extracted US data on COVID-19 deaths from the COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. We calculated state-level weekly COVID-19 death rates as weekly COVID-19 deaths per state population size from the 2019 American Community Survey. We categorized rates into quintiles based on all weekly rates during the observation period. Analyses were restricted to treated pts and indexed to start of first-line therapy. For rwPFS analyses, first occurrence of progression or death was considered an event, and pts were censored at last clinic note date. For rwTTP, only progression (not death) was considered an event, and pts with no event were censored at last clinic note date. For rwOS analyses, pts who did not die were censored at last structured activity. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between weekly time-varying state-level COVID-19 mortality rates and outcomes of rwPFS, rwTTP, and rwOS, adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and state. Result(s): Among 7,813 advNSCLC pts, the median age at diagnosis was 70 years, the majority of the cohort was non-Hispanic White (59%), had non-squamous cell histology (68%) and a history of smoking (87%). Compared to pts living in states with the lowest quintile of COVID-19 mortality rates (Q1), pts living in states with the highest COVID-19 mortality (Q5) had worse rwOS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.69) and rwPFS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33). No association was observed with rwTTP (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22). Conclusion(s): In this study of real-world oncology data, we demonstrated the use of publicly-available COVID-19 mortality data to measure the time-varying impact of COVID-19 severity on outcomes in pts with advNSCLC. Higher state-level COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with worse rwOS and rwPFS among advNSCLC pts. The association with increased mortality among pts with advNSCLC may be related to COVID-19-related mortality or other factors such as pre-existing comorbidities which were not explored in this study.

2C5-surface modified nanocarriers targeting neutrophil extracellular traps

Background: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are composed of processed chromatin bound to granular and selected cytoplasmic proteins and released by neutrophils. NETs consist of smooth filaments composed of stacked nucleosomes. Fully hydrated NETs have a cloud-like appearance and occupy a space 10-15-fold larger than the volume of the cells they originate from. DNases are the enzymes that cleave extracellular DNA including NETs. Together with their protective role in microbial infections, NETs are involved in multiple pathological processes and represent key events in a variety of pathologies including cancer, autoimmunity, and cardiovascular disease. Sites of NETs concentration are dangerous for the host if the process of NETs formation becomes chronic or the mechanism of NETs removal does not work. NETosis has been linked to the development of periodontitis, cystic fibrosis, type 2 diabetes, COVID-19 or rheumatoid arthritis as well as cancer progression. Purpose(s): Thus, the destruction of NETs is of primary significance in many pathologies. In our approach, we are focusing on mimicking one of the natural mechanisms of destroying excessive NETs by delivering deoxyribonuclease I to the specific site of pathological NETs accumulation by modifying the nanoparticles using an anti-nucleosome monoclonal antibody (2C5). The antibody is specific to nucleosomes and can recognize histones in NETs. DNase I is U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved active component and is commonly used in therapeutic methods of modern medicine for cystic fibrosis to clear extracellular DNA fibers in the lungs and systemic lupus erythematosus. Recent findings have also shown the effectiveness of DNase I in the digestion of NETs. However, the low serum stability and fast deactivation by environmental stimuli have been considered as the limiting factors for clinical applications of DNase I, which can be overcome by its targeted specific delivery in pharmaceutical nanocarriers. Method(s): In this study, we generate NETs in vitro using human neutrophils and HL-60 cells differentiated into granulocyte-like cells. We used interleukin-8, lipopolysaccharide from E.Coli (LPS), phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), and calcium ionophore A23187 (CI) to generate the NETs. We confirmed the specificity of 2C5 toward NETs by ELISA, which showed that it binds to NETs with the specificity like that for purified nucleohistone substrate. We further utilized that feature to create two delivery systems (liposomes and micelles) for DNAse I enzyme to destroy NETs, which was confirmed by staining NETs with SYTOX Green dye and followed by flow cytometric measurements and microscopic images. Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that 2C5 could be used to identify and visualize NETs and serve as a ligand for NET-targeted diagnostics and therapies. Also, we proved that our carrier can successfully deliver DNase to NETs to provide their degradation.

Outcomes of cancer patients with Covid-19 admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A retrospective study

Introduction: Active cancer increases the odds of death among patients with COVID-19.1 Cancer patients may be at increased risk of complications and mortality from COVID-19 owing to the systemic effects of malignancy, immune suppression after chemotherapy, treatment-related complications and presence of co-morbidities.2 They may develop serious complications necessitating ICU admission. In a meta-analysis, the pooled mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19 admitted to an ICU was 60.2%.3 Our hospital is a tertiary referral cancer centre, and the ICU admitted cancer patients with Covid-19 throughout the pandemic. Objective(s): To determine the 30-day in-hospital mortality of adult cancer patients with Covid-19 admitted to the ICU. We also aimed to determine the factors associated with mortality in cancer patients with Covid-19. Method(s): After approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, data of all cancer patients (age = 16 years) with Covid-19 admitted to the ICU between March 2020 and March 2021 were retrieved from the hospital records. In case of multiple ICU admissions, data from the first admission was recorded. Data recorded included demographic details, type of cancer (solid, haematological), surgical status, APACHE-II and SOFA scores, C-reactive protein, and interventions in ICU. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Data were analysed using Man-Whitney test and chi-square test. A multivariable regression analysis was carried out to determine factors associated with mortality. Result(s): Data of 127 cancer patients with Covid-19 was analysed. The median [interquartile range, IQR] age was 55 (43-62) years, and there were 50 females (39.3%). Comorbidities were present in 46 (36%) patients, the commonest being diabetes (29 patients) and hypertension (31 patients). The median [IQR] APACHE-II and SOFA scores were 15[8-20] and 4[2-7], respectively. Overall, 62/127 patients died, and 30-day hospital mortality was 49%. There were 30 patients with haematological malignancy and 97 with solid tumours with 30-day in-hospital mortality rates of 46.7% and 49.5%, respectively;p = 0.84). Amongst patients with solid tumours, there was no difference in mortality in surgical patients compared to non-surgical patients (43.3% vs. 52.2%;p = 0.42). Table 1 summarises the parameters and interventions in survivors and non-survivors. On multivariable analysis, only the change in SOFA score from Day 1 to Day 3 was independently associated with outcome (Odds ratio 1.36 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.84, p-0.04). Conclusion(s): In patients with cancer and Covid-19 and age =16 years admitted to our ICU, the crude 30-day hospital mortality was 47%. There was no association of mortality with cancer type or surgical status. The only independent predictor of mortality was progression of organ failure. Cancer patients with Covid-19 have a reasonable outcome and should be given a trial of intensive care.

Pulmonary influenza infection promotes the awakening of dormant metastatic breast cancer cells

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer and the second cancer-causing death in females. Although remission rates are high if detected early, survival rates drop substantially when breast cancer becomes metastatic. The most common sites of metastatic breast cancer are bone, liver and lung. Respiratory viral infections inflict illnesses on countless people. The latest pandemic caused by the respiratory virus, SARS-CoV-2, has infected more than 600 million worldwide, with documented COVID-related death upward of 1 million in the United States alone. Respiratory viral infections result in increased inflammation with immune cell influx and expansion to facilitate viral clearance. Prior studies have shown that inflammation, including through neutrophils, can contribute to dormant cancer cells reawakening and outgrowth. Moreover, inhibition of IL6 has been shown to decrease breast cancer lung metastasis in mouse models. However, how respiratory viral infections contribute to breast cancer lung metastasis remains to be unraveled. Using MMTV/PyMT and MMTV/NEU mouse models of breast cancer lung metastasis and influenza A virus as a model respiratory virus, we demonstrated that acute influenza infection and the accompanying inflammation and immune cell influx awakens and dramatically increased proliferation and expansion of dormant disseminated cancer cells (DCC) in the lungs. Acute influenza infection leads to immune influx and expansion, including neutrophils and macrophages, with increased proportion of MHCII+ macrophages in early time points, and a sustained decrease in CD206+ macrophages starting 6 days post-infection until 28 days after the initial infection. Additionally, we observed a sustained accumulation of CD4+ T cells around expanding tumor cells for as long as 28 days after the infection. Notably, neutrophil depletion or IL6 knockout reversed the flu-induced dormant cell expansion in the lung. Finally, awakened DCC exhibited downregulation of vimentin immunoreactivity, suggesting a role for phenotypic plasticity in DCC outgrowth following viral infection. In conclusion, we show that respiratory viral infections awaken and increase proliferation of dormant breast cancer cells in the lung, and that depletion of neutrophils or blocking IL6 reverses influenza-induced dormant cell awakening and proliferation.

Critical role of defensins in respiratory viral infection induced breast cancer progression

Respiratory viral infections (RVI) such as influenza and COVID19 impact the host systemic immune system along with causing deleterious chronic inflammatory responses and respiratory distress. While the role of chronic inflammation in cancer is well-established, the role of RVI on tumorigenesis is poorly defined. To study the role of RVI on breast cancer, we first infected murine respiratory epithelial cells (mRES) with murine sendai virus (mSV), an analog for human parainfluenza virus. These infected mRES were co-cultured with 4T1 murine breast cancer cells in 1:1 dilution on a single 2D plate and also in trans-well format. Both in co-culture and transwell culture we saw a 40- 80% (p<0.05) increased proliferation of breast cancer cells. Similarly, when 4T1 cells were treated with the supernatant collected from infected mRES cells in 1:5 dilution, also demonstrated a 2.3 fold increased breast cancer cell proliferation. The cytokine analysis from the supernatant collected from infected mRES cells demonstrated a 17-23 fold enhanced secretion of alpha/beta-defensins. Direct treatment of alpha-defensin (cyptidin-4, 10 pg/mL) and beta-defensin-3 (mBD3, 20 pg/mL) on 4T1 cells demonstrated enhanced expression of chemokine metastatic receptor, CXCR4 (4.3 fold), angiogenic factor, VEGF (12.8 fold) and cell division favoring factor, CDK2 (8.1 fold). Further, analysis of infected mRES cells demonstrated upregulation of toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and NODlike receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) expression. Interesting, co-cultured of infected mRES with syngeneic murine CD4 T cells induced exhaustion phenotype (PD1+ and CTLA4+ ) differentiation of CD4 T cells. Taken together, these data suggest that respiratory viral infections through induction of cancer cell proliferation and inhibiting anti-tumor adaptive immune responses promote breast cancer proliferation.

Importance of IP-10 as a biomarker of host immune response: Critical perspective as a target for biosensing

While the exploration into biomolecules for diagnostic and prognostic devices continues to develop, many molecules continue to be examined for individual diseases or treatments. Consequently, it can be difficult to fully understand the scope of one individual molecule's current and potential clinical utilization. The scope of this study aimed to assess the potential of Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10 (IP-10) as a biomarker in a wide variety of diseases, both as a main and supplemental indicator of disease infection and progression. IP-10 is a chemokine secreted in response to IFN-gamma playing a major role in the activation and regulation of inflammatory and immune responses within the body. Currently, IP-10 has displayed potential application in diseases such as COVID-19, tuberculosis, sepsis, Kawasaki disease, cancer, and many more. Molecular assays developed for the detection of IP-10 take longer testing time, sophisticated instrument utilization, and need more sample volumes. These cannot be utilized for bedside patient monitoring during the illness state of the patient. Biosensing tools are alternative methods used at clinical sites due to their rapid results. Though many types of sensing mechanisms established for the detection of disease biomarkers such as optical, piezoelectric sensors, and electrochemical biosensors are far beyond the other sensing methods due to their ease of mechanism, rapid results, and portable nature. IP-10 has been a promising biomarker in different diseases, evaluation of IP-10 levels at different time points of treatments is necessary. To achieve this, current conventional methods cannot be used and thus a portable device that provides rapid results is in demand. Such point-of-care (POC) device development for IP-10 analysis is very crucial in the current scenario. Beyond this, the clarification of its physiological role in healthy and infected individuals could allow for more proper utilization in clinical diagnoses, prognoses, treatment monitoring, and more. Overall, this study was developed to summarize the associations currently created between levels of IP-10 and other biomolecules and diseases.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s)

Outcome of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with a Donor and Recipient Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2), has impacted many facets of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in both developed and developing countries. The full impact of the COVID 19 pandemic, caused by the SARS CoV 2, on the field of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is unknown. Here, we report a rare case of a 21-year-old male patient known to have chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with progression to T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma as extramedullary blast crisis of CML. The patient was treated by pediatric chemotherapy regimen then. He underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Posttransplantation, on day +7, he developed SARS-CoV-2 after receiving stem cell graft from a donor who was diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 on the day of stem cells harvesting. The case elaborates complications and outcome of a patient receiving stem cell transplant from a donor with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Copyright © 2023 Journal of Applied Hematology Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.

Anaplastic extramedullary plasmacytoma resistant to novel therapies: A case report

The treatment of choice for extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is radiotherapy (RT). It is under discussion whether the management of an anaplastic form of EMP requires the addition of systemic therapy. We present a case of a 66-year-old male who was diagnosed with anaplastic plasmacytoma of the maxillary sinus. After the exclusion of multiple myeloma, Dara-VMP (daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisolone) regimen was initiated. During the third cycle of Dara-VMP, a progression of the tumor was observed. RT and BRd (bendamustine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide) regimen were initiated. After 4 cycles of BRd, disease progression was established. KRd (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) regimen was initiated. The first cycle of KRd was not completed, as the patient was diagnosed with COVID-19. After the infection, the progression of EMP was observed. In this case, the anaplastic EMP was resistant to RT and chemotherapy regimens with novel agents, including a monoclonal antibody, an immunomodulatory drug, and proteasome inhibitors. Copyright © 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

EMERALD trial analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) comparing oral elacestrant vs standard of care (SoC) endocrine therapy

Background: The phase III EMERALD trial (NCT03778931) reported significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile with elacestrant vs SoC endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (N=478) with ER+/HER2- advanced or mBC following progression on prior CDK4/6i plus ET. PROs measuring quality of life (QoL) are reported here. Method(s): EMERALD patients (pts) completed 3 PRO tools at prespecified time points: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Result(s): The ratio of PROs tools completed vs. PROs tools expected was 80-90% through cycle 4 and approximately 70% at cycle 6;likely due to clinical study period overlapping with COVID-19 period. Overall, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar for elacestrant and SoC, with no differences across all time points for both functional and symptom scales. However, PRO-CTCAE results showed that fewer pts who received elacestrant reported very severe nausea (4.0% vs 14.3% by cycle 6) or very severe vomiting (9.1% vs 50% by cycle 6) compared with SoC. There were no clinically meaningful differences across all time points in adverse events typically observed with pts with cancer on ET, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, joint and muscle pain and hot flashes. EQ-5D-5L scores were generally comparable throughout treatment for both study arms, with elacestrant showing numerically better outcomes vs SoC for mobility, self-care and usual activities. Similar trends were observed for the full intent-to-treat population and in pts with detectable estrogen receptor 1 mutations (ESR1m). Conclusion(s): This analysis confirmed that QoL was maintained between treatment groups in the EMERALD trial. Together with the previously described statistically significant prolonged PFS and manageable safety profile, these PRO results provide additional evidence that oral elacestrant is clinically meaningful in this patient population with limited therapeutic options. Clinical trial identification: NCT03778931. Editorial acknowledgement: Jeffrey Walter, IQVIA. Legal entity responsible for the study: Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Funding(s): Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Disclosure: J. Cortes: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, GSK, LEUKO, Bioasis, Clovis oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting/advisor: Expres2ion Biotechnologies;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MedSIR, Nektar Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma B, Queen Mary University of London;Other, Travel cost and expenses: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Gilead, AstraZeneca. F.C. Bidard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Radius Health, Menarini;Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: Menarini;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly, Rain Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Prolynx;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, patents: ESR1 & MSI detection techniques;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis. A. Bardia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, Sanofi, Eisa , Lilly, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Menarini, Gilead;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: UpToDate;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly.;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Gilead, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Sanofi. V.G. Kaklamani: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daichi, Gilead Sciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, Eisai, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Athenex, bioTheranostics;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Genentech, Novartis, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Eisai. I. Vlachaki: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Hellas A.E. G. Tonini: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. N. Habboubi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Stemline Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Stemline Therapeutics. P.G. Aftimos: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Macrogenics, Roche, Novartis, Amcure, Servier, G1 Therapeutics, Radius, Deloitte, Menarini, Gilead, Novartis, Eisai, Lilly;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Synthon, Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche.Copyright © 2023

Effectiveness and Safety of Nirmatrelvir/ Ritonavir in Real Life Setting

Background and Importance On March 28th 2022, nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir was marketed in Spain. The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS) established criteria to prioritise its administration in patients at high risk of progression to severe COVID. Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir in preventing severe coronavirus disease outcomes are limited. Aim and Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients at high risk for severe COVID-19. Material and Methods Prospective descriptive study from April to August 2022 of patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Sociodemographic variables, vaccination status, hospital admission, high risk factors for progression and concomitant treatment were recorded. Readmissions were recorded within 30 days of the end of antiviral treatment. Results 53 patients were included with a mean age of 64 years, 51% women and 49% men. 57% were vaccinated with 3 doses, 17% with 2 doses, 9% with 4 doses, 6% with 1 dose and 11% were not vaccinated. 34% (18/53) were hospitalised at the time of initiation of treatment. The most prevalent high-risk criteria were: 24% active treatment with myelotoxic chemotherapy, 21% treatment in the previous 6 months with anti-CD20 drugs, 14% over 80 years vaccinated with some risk factor for progression, 7% patients with onco-haematological treatment and 7% in treatment in the previous 3 months with inhibitors of the proteinkinase. 3 treatments were performed off-label for persistent covid. The mean number of days from the onset of symptoms to the start of treatment was 1.6 days. 23% of patients required dose adjustment due to renal impairment. 53% required adjustment of chronic treatment for interactions, mainly with metamizole, statins, fentanyl and diazepam. 2 patients received remdesivir and sotrovimab, 2 remdesivir and another two sotrovimab. 4 (7%) patients were readmitted within 30 days after the end of treatment with nirmatrelvir ritonavir, 1 of them with persistent covid. One patient stopped treatment for hives. Conclusion and Relevance Nirmatrelvir ritonavir has been shown to be a safe and effective drug in high-risk patients of progression to severe covid.

COVID-19 vaccination behavior and outcomes in patients with genitourinary cancer in comparison with other cancer types

Background: Cancer(ca) and old age are risk factors for developing severe COVID-19 (C19+) disease, related morbidity and mortality. These patients (pts) were excluded from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of 3 FDA approved C19 vaccines (vax). Genitourinary (GU) ca-prostate, bladder and kidney ca contribute to the majority of non-skin ca and median age of these pts range from 65-75 yrs. We aimed to study these highly vulnerable pts behavior and outcomes regarding C19 vax in comparison to non-GU ca pts (18-89 years). Method(s): A prospective and observational single center study. Adult ca pts seen in clinics from Nov 2021-Sept 2022 were randomly interviewed using telephone surveys after a verbal consent. Type of ca and therapy data were collected from pts' medical records. The survey included C19 disease status, vax status positive (+) or negative (-), reason for vax status, side effects (s.e), impact on ca Rx or ca progression. Data was entered on REDCap. The primary end point was rate of vaccination in adult ca pts. Secondary end points were to quantify C19 vax acceptance vs. hesitance, identify s.e of C19 vax and effect of C19 vax on outcomes in GU and non-GU Ca pts. Result(s): N=172;GU ca 21 (12.2%) and non-GUca 151 (87.8%). Among GU ca pts- 9 had prostate ca, 7 had bladder ca and 5 had renal ca. C19+ in 4 (19%) GU and 45 (30.2%) non-GU pts. GU pts: 90.5% received C19 vax (Pfizer 47.6%;Moderna 42.9%, J & J 0%);9.5% were not vaxed. Non-GU pts: 85.2% received C19 vax (Pfizer 39.1%;Moderna 43%, J & J 2.6%);14.8% were not vaxed. The top 3 risk factors for serious C19+ were age >65yr (76.2%), heart disease (61.9%) and BMI.30 (42.9%) in GU ca pts and age >65yr (46.4%), BMI.30 (35.1%) and smoking (19.9%) in non-GU ca pts. The top 3 reasons for C19 vax (+) in GU ca pts: protection against C19+ for self (81%), for others (47.6%) and provider recommendation (38.1%). The main reasons for vax hesitancy in C19 vax (-) GU ca pts: concern for allergy to the vax (4.8%) and prior C19 infection (4.8%). The common s.e of C19 vax reported in GU ca pts were injection site inflammation (19%), headache (4.8%), muscle/body aches (4.8%) but no lymphadenopathy. None of GU ca pts reported delay in Rx or progression of the disease due to C-19 vax. Conclusion(s): C19 vax were overall well tolerated and did not impact ca outcomes in pts with GU malignancies. Oncologists should discuss the importance of C19 vax in the context of ca.

The impact of COVID 19 pandemic on pattern of cancer mortality in Najran, Saudi Arabia: A single-cancer center experience: Cancer mortality during COVID 19

Aim: To explore the association between mortality and Covid infection, age, sex, site of cancer, stage, and the interval between the last dose of chemotherapy given within the last 30 days before death. Material(s) and Method(s): Adult cancer patients who died of cancer in King Khalid Hospital in Najran-Saudi Arabia, were included in this retrospective observational study. We compared mortality patterns in a period of 6 months in 2020 (March to August) with the corresponding period of 2019. Result(s): 50 dead adult cancer patients were included, 24 in 2019 and 26 in 2020. Among them, 21% vs 42% were younger than 65 years of age;61% vs 62% were males, for the years 2019 & 2020 respectively. The top three killers in 2019 were colorectal, gastro-esophageal cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma, while in 2020 were colorectal, hepatocellular carcinoma, and lymphomas. About 16.7% of patients died within 30 days of receiving anti-cancer treatment in 2019 in comparison with 7.7% in 2020. The difference in the 30-days mortality after receiving anti-cancer treatment was not statistically significant between 2019 and 2020 (p=0.329). Discussion(s): The Year 2020, the time of the COVID-19pandemic, was not associated with a significant increase in the short-term mortality among patients with malignancy in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Our results generally reflect the crucial role of strict preventive national measures in saving lives and warrants further exploration.Copyright © 2022, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.

Relinkage of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Introduction and Objectives: In Argentina, it is estimated that around 50% of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have been diagnosed and only 5% of those have accessed treatment after several months;this reality got worse with the pandemic. World Health Organization proposed a global health sector strategy to eliminate HCV as a public health threat by 2030. Key elements of the elimination plan include increased diagnosis and treatment access. This study aimed to describe the implementation of "Relinkage and simplified care pathway program" as a strategy for micro-elimination of HCV. Material(s) and Method(s): : Hospital outpatients aged over 18 years, with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of HCV infection and without follow-up during the last year, were included. Patient selection was made by collecting data from medical records. Selected patients were contacted by telephone and scheduled for a clinic visit with a simplified care pathway. "Reflex Testing," which is an HCV antibody test, was used;if the result was positive, an HCV RNA and genotype test on the same specimen was performed. Untreated and non-responder patients were treated. Result(s): : A total of 938 patients were included, and 409 (44%) could be reached. Out Of these, 16.3% (67) died, 1.7% (7) developed hepatocellular carcinoma, and 6.75% (15) progressed to cirrhosis. We found that 21.7% were candidates for treatment, and the treatment was delivered in two clinic visits with an average time of 29 days (7-69). However, 41% (34) of patients with cirrhosis could not be contacted. Conclusion(s): : Program implementation improved the diagnosis and treatment access. Furthermore, it reduces the number of clinical visits and may increase adherence to follow-up. On the other hand, we are concerned that half of the patients were lost on the follow-up and about their progression to cirrhosis rate. If we are looking for different results, we should take different measures.Copyright © 2023

Immunohistochemical profile of cell cycle control, proliferation and differentiation proteins of the pulmonary atypical alveolar epithelium with COVID-19-induced diffuse alveolar damage as compared to pulmonary [lepidic-growth] adenocarcinoma

We aim aim to compare immunophenotypic charac-teritics of atypical epithelium (AE) with COVID-19-induced diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) and pulmonary lepidic-growth adenocarcinoma, accounting for cell cycle control, proliferation and differentiation]. Methods. We examined pulmonary tissue specimens from twenty-four fatal cases of CO VID-19-induced acute respiratory damage syndrome confirmed by autopsy (Group 1) and four cases of pulmonary lepidic-growth adenocarcinoma (Group 2). Perpendicular dimensions of 10 nuclei were measured on the H&E slides, means of their sums of products (SPNM) were calculated. We have used p53, Ki67, pi6, p63 antibodies for immunohistochemical staining in each case. We evaluate co¬lour intensity, rate of stained cells of AE and the product of these parameters. We evaluated separately Nuclear and cyto-plasmic staining (couple) and only cytoplasmic staining (cyt) for pi6 expression. We measured proliferative index only at KI-67 stained slides. U-test and Spearman rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Results. Expression of p63 was higher in group 1 (p=0.001), while pi6 was more frequently expressed in group 2 (p=0.002). We have found no statistically significant differences (p>0.1) in the p53 and Ki67 expression. Group 1 showed There was negative correlation between the number of days from onset of symptoms and the following variables: Ki67 (r=M).587, p=0.003);SPNM (r 0.406, p=0.049). Conclusion. The present study has shown heterogeneity in levels of cell cycle control expression, proliferation and differentiation of atypical epithelium in the pulmonary lep-idic-growth adenocarcinoma and CO VID-19-induced diffuse alveolar damage.

Role of race in accelerating progression of colorectal cancer

African Americans present earlier in age and have higher incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to Whites. Socioeconomic inequality in the US that leads to higher comorbid illness among African Americans is likely a driver. Subsequent biological differences in African Americans include higher risk adenoma precursors that are more often proximally located in the colon, low microstatellite instability prevalence, and deficient immunologic profiles compared to Whites that contribute to cancer progression and outcome. Screening for CRC among African Americans had been recommended by some organizations to commence at age 45 or 40 years due to the observed epidemiology;this was not implemented until the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended CRC screening to commence at age 45 years for all races and ethnicities in 2021.Screening for CRC is one modality of intervention that can eliminate disparities;both colonoscopic and non-invasive screening have been shown to eliminate incidence and mortality differences between African Americans and Whites when using navigation. Recent gains in screening utilization among African Americans compared to Whites might be erased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Navigated non-invasive CRC screening might help the unevenness of preventive services recovery from the pandemic if it can be fully implemented.

Sarcopenia in Children with Liver Disease: A Pilot Study

Background and Aims Sarcopenia can be defined as loss of muscle mass, strength and function and has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the adult population. Sarcopenia has been assessed by decreased psoas muscle surface area (PMSA) on Computer tomography (CT) and has been validated in paediatric studies. The impact of Sarcopenia in children with end stage liver disease and oncological conditions is now being recognised. There is scarce literature on the effect of sarcopenia on motor function. CT imaging exposes children to radiation and hence is done in a select group of children at the time of transplant assessment. The aim of this audit was to assess the prevalence of Sarcopenia in children undergoing liver transplant assessment and its relationship on laboratory variables, functional activity and clinical outcomes. Methods Retrospective single centre case review of patients with liver disease undergoing transplant assessment and CT imaging between 2018-2020. Psoas muscle was analysed at the level of L4/L5. The z-Scores were calculated using ageand gender-specific reference values. Sarcopenia was defined as tPMA z score less than -2. We assessed the relationship of Sarcopenia to the biochemical parameters, nutritional status, effect on motor delay/physical abilities (assessed by a range of age appropriate standardised developmental and physical assessments due to COVID pandemic isolation restrictions) and post-transplant complications. Results Thirty one children that met the inclusion criteria were included. Sarcopenia was prevalent in 17 children (6 males: 11 females), with a median age of 3.5 years (SD = 4.9). The common conditions were biliary atresia (n= 11, 35%), hepatoblastoma (n=6, 19%), Autoimmune hepatitis (n=3) etc. Twenty- four patients required additional nutritional support (77% nasogastric feeding, 13% PN and 6% oral supplementation). Mean tPMA z-score was -2.27. Data for the assessment of physical abilities/functional activity was available in 21 children. Impairment of motor skills/physical abilities was overall noted in 14/21 children (67%);9/13 (69%) in the sarcopenic group (6 significant impairment) vs 5/8 (63%) in non sarcopenic group (4 significant impairment). Sarcopenia was associated with increased complications (27 vs 7, p = 0.005) and hypoalbuminaemia (p=0.01), but was not statistically significant (p> 0.05) for the overall length of stay (total and intensive care). Discussion Sarcopenia was commonly identified in children with liver diseases undergoing transplant assessment. Reduction in physical abilities/functional activity was observed in both groups which may be a consequence of loss of muscle mass in children secondary to liver diseases or underlying oncological conditions leading to delay in gross motor skills. Although there was no statistical difference in the duration of stay or impairment of motor skills, complications were higher in the sarcopenic group. Conclusion In this pilot study, sarcopenia is prevalent in children being assessed for liver transplantation and was associated with increased complications. Better non-invasive methods (aside from CT scan) of assessing sarcopenia needs to be developed and validated for the paediatric age group, which would help to better characterise the true incidence and prevalence of sarcopenia in children with chronic liver disease. There is a need to offer nutritional support and assess physical function early in the pre transplant period in order to initiate appropriate physiotherapy interventions to halt and even reverse the progression of sarcopenia.

Cancer, Covid and Control of Ra - a Toxic Combination?

Case report - Introduction: This case highlights the dilemma of keeping rheumatoid arthritis disease under control in active cancer cases and establishing a consistent multidisciplinary dialogue during a pandemic and staffing crises. During chemotherapy and active cancer treatment, disease-modifying therapies (conventional and biologic) are often stopped. In some cases, the potential benefits versus risks of restarting usual therapies have to be balanced against risks of suppressing disease activity with highdose steroids. Risks of infection (common and atypical) need to be considered. Case report - Case description: A is a 67-year-old female nonsmoker diagnosed with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RF, anti - CCP positive) in 2008. Other conditions include type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (on warfarin), hypothyroidism and obstructive sleep apnoea. Due to active disease, despite triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine), anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) commenced in 2009 with primary non-response. However, she responded well to B-cell therapy (rituximab) in conjunction with oral methotrexate (25mg weekly) receiving annual infusions from 2010 to 2016. In 2017, an elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure for high BMI was abandoned after peritoneal deposits of concern were noted. Histology and CT imaging were consistent with a primary peritoneal malignancy (Stage 3c low-grade serous adenocarcinoma). Treatment involved debulking surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpinoophorectomy, omentectomy) and tamoxifen. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis stalled during this period but as frequent steroids were required for active joint inflammation, in agreement with the oncologists, she had a rituximab cycle in 2018. Unfortunately, in 2019 she had signs of cancer progression (elevated tumour markers, CT imaging) and has subsequently started carboplatin chemotherapy. She has been unable to continue methotrexate or rituximab pending completion of the chemotherapy cycles (ongoing). However, her arthritis is now uncontrolled without increased steroids. Due to recurrent flares, her maintenance dose has been increased from 5mg to 7.5-10mg prednisolone daily until we can establish if it is safe and appropriate to recommence her usual arthritis regime. Even without disease-modifying therapy like methotrexate and rituximab, risk of infection (including atypical ones) is still significant with the combination of chemotherapy and steroids. Risk of progressive joint damage and adverse quality of life with active arthritis also needs to be considered. Staffing crises, exacerbated by COVID pandemic issues, have added to complexity of decision making and coordination of regular multidisciplinary discussions regarding treatment. Case report - Discussion: Cancer is a known association in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a twofold higher risk of lymphoma compared to the general population. Whether condition or treatment affects risk remains unclear as immune dysregulation is relevant in both autoimmunity and cancer. Paraneoplastic, recent onset arthritis, chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-induced arthralgia/arthritis are also well documented. This case had a seropositive rheumatoid arthritis phenotype quite a few years prior to cancer diagnosis. Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon, often presenting as in this case as an incidental finding. It is usually treated like ovarian cancer Whilst methotrexate has been implicated in lung cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, overall safety data suggest any risk is quite low (e.g., EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders usually resolve with drug discontinuation). It is also a known chemotherapeutic agent. Anti-TNF treatment algorithms generally exclude patients with recent cancer. Rituximab, originally developed as a cancer drug, is not thought to affect risk of cancer development or progression. Treatment with disease-modifying therapy (conventional and biologics) is often withheld in patients with active malignancy undergoing chemotherapy due to a theo etical risk of potentiated immunosuppression and toxicity, particularly cytopaenias. However, maintaining arthritis control with glucocorticoids also has short- and long-term risks. Combining chemotherapy agents like carboplatin with methotrexate has been used for urothelial carcinoma and can be well tolerated with close monitoring of haematological parameters. Thus, it could be argued this patient is at risk of infections whichever treatment approach is taken and regaining control of arthritis with recommencement of methotrexate and rituximab is much better for her quality of life. Regular multidisciplinary discussions are important to outline risks versus benefits of combined treatment. This may be difficult in practice during staffing crises. Covid risk in patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy, timing and response to COVID vaccination are also important considerations. Case report - Key learning points: . Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon and can present as an incidental finding . Whilst treatment for progressive cancer is important, withholding rheumatoid arthritis treatment can have a significant adverse impact on quality of life . Morbidity and mortality risks of stopping treatment versus combined treatment (cancer therapy and disease-modifying therapy) ideally needs to be fully discussed and agreed with the patient and all care providers - lack of "named" providers, restructuring, redeployment, multi-specialty care and a global pandemic can make coordination of this difficult.